"Truth Is On The Side Of the Oppressed." – Malcolm X
When Russia forced the terms of European security onto the table at Abu Dhabi, two Atlanticist columnists had a hell of an answer: put NATO’s commander in charge of the peace talks. Washington built that alliance’s power while capitalist restoration weakened Russia, and now it wants European treasuries to carry more of the cost while... Continue Reading →
In Hayek’s Bastards, Quinn Slobodian follows the thinkers, patrons, and political operators who turned capitalist command into a cause dressed as rebellion. Race, IQ, and evolutionary stories make dispossession look deserved, while borders and private communities separate useful labor from the right to challenge its conditions. Gold promises shelter from collective demands, and the self-appointed... Continue Reading →
Britain steps forward to rescue indebted countries with the creditor’s authority tucked safely beneath its humanitarian robes. Behind the promises of relief, contracts and lending conditions turn claims on future labor into pressure on wages, hospitals, and household budgets. London invokes slavery while keeping the discussion of justice seated at the repayment table. Breaking that... Continue Reading →
Lula’s reelection kept open a fight over who gets to set the terms in South America. Washington wants a hemisphere it can use as a secure base for U.S. power. Brazil has the factories, public banks and political reach to help its neighbors build an independent pole, and China’s industrial rise gives them more room... Continue Reading →
On March 27, 1922, Lenin laid bare the haunting reality: the very Communists who seized power found themselves ensnared by its apparatus. This stark confession at the Eleventh Party Congress revealed a party entangled in bureaucratic paralysis while popular hunger and dissatisfaction grew. Lenin's urgent demand for practical economic leadership served as a clarion call to reconnect with the peasant workforce crucial for reconstruction. He confronted the failure to actualize revolutionary ideals, asserting that maintaining authority required genuine engagement with people’s needs. In essence, he challenged the Bolshevik leadership: Could they transform power into effectiveness before disillusionment turned into revolt? The stakes were sky-high, a failure to adapt would be their undoing.
The War Built the Border: Sudan’s Partition Before the Ceasefire This essay argues that Sudan’s threatened partition didn’t begin with Washington’s latest ceasefire proposal. It traces the crisis through British colonial extraction, unequal development, Western creditor power, military accumulation, and the unfinished struggle opened by the December Revolution. As SAF and RSF turned on each other, war hardened front lines into rival economies, institutions, and systems of rule. The ceasefire therefore confronts a division already being built rather than creating it from nothing. Beneath the armies and foreign diplomacy, Sudanese civilian networks continue defending another basis for sovereignty rooted in the people who keep the country alive.
UNGA 81 looked like a week of separate crises: Palestine, Iran, Venezuela, artificial intelligence and China. Beneath the speeches, however, each exposed the same unfinished contradiction between formal sovereignty and the unequal material power needed to make sovereignty real. Gaza’s reconstruction, Venezuela’s oil revenues, Iran’s negotiations under coercion, and the Global South’s struggle for technological capacity all reveal how finance, property, military force and infrastructure shape what legal equality can actually deliver. The summit’s real story wasn’t only what leaders said from the podium, but who still controls the machinery that gives those words weight.
Michael Hudson's "Super Imperialism" reveals capitalism's peculiar twist: the U.S. transitioned from a great creditor to a dominant debtor, utilizing its debts as leverage in a world where power dynamics are shifting. Post-World War I, American financial institutions crafted a system that exploited other nations through debt, claiming to promote development while actually enforcing dependency. The contradiction lies in the U.S. controlling the world's currency even as its productive supremacy fades. As the global landscape evolves, the implications of dollar dominance become increasingly tenuous, demanding us to confront a crucial question—who ultimately commands the productive forces that money can influence but not generate?
The Gulf monarchies, once loyal to Washington's military dominance, are now scrambling for survival in a world where Iranian aggression opposes their established security framework. The ongoing war has exposed a perilous contradiction: the very American military infrastructure meant to protect the Gulf states has rendered them vulnerable to Iranian strikes. As the U.S. becomes a less reliable ally, these nations are cautiously seeking dialogue with Tehran, marking a seismic shift in regional politics. Their actions aren't a break from American influence but a pragmatic response to an urgent need for stability amidst rising tensions. The question remains—can they navigate this treacherous terrain without abandoning old alliances?
Trump's United Nations address declares America’s resurgence, yet it reveals an empire grappling with an escalating need for military force and economic coercion to maintain supremacy. His speech elevates military spending, sanctions, and immigration enforcement as signs of strength while ignoring the underlying contradictions—an empire that once commanded effortlessly now relies heavily on intimidation. The reality is that the U.S. must work harder to enforce its will both abroad and domestically as competition grows and global power dynamics shift. Instead of showcasing dominance, Trump's rhetoric underscores a declining ability to produce consent, exposing the fragility of American imperialism. The mask of effortless domination is slipping.
