"Truth Is On The Side Of the Oppressed." – Malcolm X
The ongoing crisis is no mere conflict but a hyper-imperialist war where the U.S. threatens annihilation to maintain control over global energy chokepoints. Beneath the surface of chaos, the narrative of mutual escalation obscures grim realities: state violence, war crimes, and an empire's desperate bid to stave off a multipolar future, demanding urgent resistance.
As military spending skyrockets, social programs are slashed under the guise of “budget priorities.” This isn’t just fiscal prudence; it’s a calculated betrayal. The old social contract is dead, replaced by a system where austerity and militarization reign, revealing an empire fraying at the edges, clinging to power through coercion.
The bombs falling on Iran did not begin this war—they reveal it. For decades, U.S. strategy has worked to break states, choke economies, and fracture regions in order to control the flow of energy and discipline any path of independent development. What looks like a regional conflict is the tightening of a global vise, aimed... Continue Reading →
The Intercept’s account of Trump’s Venezuela “success” exposes colonial features of the new order, but still stops short of naming the imperial body on the table. Beneath the language of reform and normalization lies a forced recalibration: oil, minerals, law, diplomacy, and public finance are being reorganized under duress while the Bolivarian state struggles to... Continue Reading →
POLITICO turns a deep political rupture into spectacle, masking a crisis rooted in repression, dependency, and anti-communist rule. Beneath that spectacle lies a system shaped by coup attempts, militarized governance, U.S. command integration, and a society strained by inequality and dislocation. What appears as imported MAGA politics is in reality an old state logic speaking... Continue Reading →
This review of The Economic War Against Cuba by Salim Lamrani excavates the historical architecture of the U.S. blockade and reinterprets it through the present conjuncture, revealing it not as a failed Cold War relic but as an evolving system of imperial economic warfare. Moving from trade embargo to extraterritorial coercion to full-spectrum energy siege,... Continue Reading →
The New York Times launders U.S. regime-change demands into the language of negotiation, masking domination as diplomacy. Beneath the narrative, a coordinated campaign of economic strangulation—especially through energy chokepoints—reveals deliberate coercion, not Cuban failure. This pressure is part of a broader imperial recalibration: the consolidation of Fortress America as a hemispheric bloc under U.S. control.... Continue Reading →
A Military.com analysis presents U.S. recognition of Somaliland as pragmatic strategy, disguising a deeper imperial project. The colonial fracture between British and Italian Somaliland, combined with postcolonial crisis, has been repurposed into an opening for external intervention. What appears as diplomacy is in fact the conversion of territory into infrastructure—Berbera as port, base, and extractive... Continue Reading →
The New York Times frames imperial vulnerability as logistical inconvenience, masking the political meaning of exposure. The reconstructed facts reveal a war fought across an integrated system of bases, airspace, and energy choke points from Hormuz to Kharg. The deeper contradiction shows an empire that can still project force but can no longer prevent that... Continue Reading →
The Independent recasts the DPRK–Belarus treaty as suspicious alignment while obscuring sanctions, war, and coercion shaping both states. The actual record shows concrete agreements across food, healthcare, industry, and education built through ongoing diplomatic coordination. These developments emerge from Korea’s imposed partition, Belarus’s post-Soviet Western pressure, and their shared positioning alongside Russia in the Ukraine... Continue Reading →
Weaponized Information 