"Truth Is On The Side Of the Oppressed." – Malcolm X
The Times of India packages Saudi money, Turkish military power and Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal into the spectacle of an emerging “Islamic NATO,” while burying the war and contradictions that made the agreement intelligible. Beneath the headline lies an older architecture of military cooperation, energy dependence and regional hedging accelerated by a U.S.-Israeli war that devastated... Continue Reading →
Marco Rubio’s new sanctions do not merely target Cuban military procurement. They strike the institutions, banking channels, suppliers, repair systems, and foreign relationships through which Cuba survives a blockade designed to manufacture deprivation and political surrender. Washington restricts fuel, finance, technology, and trade, then presents the resulting hardship as proof of socialist failure. As Cuba turns toward China, Russia, and other partners to preserve its sovereignty, those lifelines are recast as threats. Behind the language of security lies the old imperial objective: isolate the island, weaken its defenses, deepen popular suffering, and force the Cuban Revolution to kneel.
The so-called manufacturing rebound lauded by CNBC is a deceptive mirage masking an imperial crisis. Beneath flashy growth numbers lie the ruins of a deindustrialized America, where financial extraction and reliance on foreign inputs have left vital sectors like semiconductors and military production at risk. Tariffs inflate costs, wars disrupt essential supply chains, and the resulting economic strain is shifted onto workers and marginalized communities. Capital demands industry without meaningful investment in labor or infrastructure, turning factories into fortresses of control rather than engines of prosperity. This isn't a renaissance; it's an imperial scramble desperately attempting to reclaim dominance amid its own financial decay.
The State Department's report conflates documented espionage with a sweeping indictment of social movements, branding students, revolutionaries, and dissenters as part of a conspiracy orchestrated from Cuba. This narrative denies local struggles against oppression, instead framing resistance as a foreign-directed plot, thus erasing historical context and the material origins of dissent. The document's loose connection between Cuba's influence and contemporary activism serves as a McCarthyite tool against American dissent. By equating genuine political engagement with espionage, it aims to squash revolutionary consciousness and reinforce the status quo, revealing the empire's fear that the oppressed might unite and resist independently.
The world is turning its back on the American Empire as perceptions shift dramatically in favor of China, a shift underscored by a recent Pew survey revealing greater global trust in China over the U.S. The BBC attempts to downplay this trend, attributing it to America's chaotic leadership under Trump, but the truth lies in a stark reality: nations are weary of U.S. interference and long for a relationship defined by trade, not military might. This reversal signals not just a popularity contest but a fundamental reevaluation of power dynamics. The challenge now is to harness this anti-imperialist sentiment into a mass movement against war with China.
The New York Times paints Marco Rubio as Venezuela's imperial viceroy, wielding control over its government through military force, financial manipulation, and a façade of diplomacy. This orchestrated colonial domination, disguised as governance, reveals a grotesque power dynamic where a nation’s sovereignty is traded for political tapestries spun by Washington. While Rubio's grip tightens, the real resistance lies among Venezuelans and anti-imperialist allies in the U.S. They must dismantle U.S.-imposed sanctions and return Venezuela’s wealth to its people. The struggle against colonial rule continues, as the masses can't be merely passive subjects in the rewriting of their national story.
Trump says you can be a communist or a patriot—but not both. This essay exposes the historical fraud buried inside that slogan. By reconstructing the nation through historical materialism, it shows that nationalism has never possessed a fixed political content. In oppressed nations, communists repeatedly became the truest patriots because the struggle for national liberation demanded the overthrow of colonialism, imperialism, and comprador rule. In imperialist nations, however, nationalism serves the opposite function: binding workers to the ruling class and its global system of domination. The real contradiction is not between communism and patriotism, but between imperial patriotism and the liberation of the people.
In a provocative shake-up, Foreign Affairs describes China, Russia, Iran, and DPRK as a nascent threat, labeling them "worse than an axis." This insinuation reveals a deep-seated imperial anxiety rather than a justified concern over a military conspiracy. These nations are forging multipolar alliances that challenge Western hegemony—an act of sovereign defiance unsettling the imperial status quo. The article underscores an inherent fear of an empowered Global South, no longer obedient to the West’s dictate. It’s not about a looming conquest but about nations rising to reclaim their sovereignty, thus threatening the very structure that sustains Western dominance. Forget the “axis” narrative; recognize the emerging world order as a potential liberation movement for the oppressed.
Bhaskar Sunkara’s market socialism is a bold yet flawed vision that naively overlooks the burdens of imperialism. He critiques past socialist models while proposing that worker-run firms can flourish within a system still embedded in capitalist exploitation. However, the reality is that these worker enterprises would still rely on the global hierarchy that upholds imperial advantages. A true socialist awakening must reject these inherited structures and demands an anti-imperialist framework instead. Without confronting the realities of colonial legacies and ensuring reparative relations, Sunkara’s proposal risks socializing the benefits of imperialism while maintaining its oppressive mechanisms intact.
The Seattle Pride Match is not just a progressive celebration but a vehicle for imperial propaganda, co-opting the cultural struggles of predominantly Muslim nations like Iran and Egypt. This event frames the West as a moral authority while masking the brutal realities of sanctions, military finance, and surveillance that underpin these dynamics. The local organizers, corporate sponsors, and FIFA collaborate to transform a football match into a colonial lesson, undermining the very values they profess to uphold. The real challenge lies in recognizing this manipulation and reframing the narrative: embracing genuine solidarity and resistance against imperial structures, rather than succumbing to an illusion of moral superiority.
