"Truth Is On The Side Of the Oppressed." – Malcolm X
Al Jazeera questions whether Washington can seal Iran off while leaving its claimed right to impose the siege largely unchallenged. Iran’s railways, productive capacity and partnerships with China and Russia reveal years of preparation against economic strangulation. Beneath the talk of weapons flows lies a struggle over who gets to decide whether a country can... Continue Reading →
Britain steps forward to rescue indebted countries with the creditor’s authority tucked safely beneath its humanitarian robes. Behind the promises of relief, contracts and lending conditions turn claims on future labor into pressure on wages, hospitals, and household budgets. London invokes slavery while keeping the discussion of justice seated at the repayment table. Breaking that... Continue Reading →
POLITICO hears power draining out of Trump’s White House, but the freedom of a banker to turn down a presidential favor tells us damn little about who can stop a war. From Nixon’s secret bombing of Cambodia through the post-9/11 grants of authority and the surveillance powers Democrats helped renew, Washington spent decades building the... Continue Reading →
Thomas Friedman tours China’s factories, admires what he sees, and calls for rebuilding Western power to compel Beijing’s obedience. Behind the machinery stands a revolutionary history of socialist construction that’s helped break the imperial centers’ grip on advanced production. Washington’s technological restrictions defend the power to decide who develops, on whose terms, and for whose... Continue Reading →
Putin's charm offensive in Moscow, showcased by forty-eight African delegations, hardly veils the reality that African leaders exist merely as props in a grand stage play. While Russia pitches economic promises, it's the West's narrative that dominates, portraying Africa as a passive recipient. Yet, beneath the political theater, African ambitions for self-sufficiency simmer, illustrated by the African Union's strong call for industrialization and local production. This counter-narrative reveals a continent striving to wrest control from neocolonial shackles, challenging a status quo predicated on dependency. The struggle isn’t merely for trade; it's a fierce reclamation of agency long denied. Africa’s narrative is reshaping, and the stakes are higher than ever.
The War Built the Border: Sudan’s Partition Before the Ceasefire This essay argues that Sudan’s threatened partition didn’t begin with Washington’s latest ceasefire proposal. It traces the crisis through British colonial extraction, unequal development, Western creditor power, military accumulation, and the unfinished struggle opened by the December Revolution. As SAF and RSF turned on each other, war hardened front lines into rival economies, institutions, and systems of rule. The ceasefire therefore confronts a division already being built rather than creating it from nothing. Beneath the armies and foreign diplomacy, Sudanese civilian networks continue defending another basis for sovereignty rooted in the people who keep the country alive.
The Gulf monarchies, once loyal to Washington's military dominance, are now scrambling for survival in a world where Iranian aggression opposes their established security framework. The ongoing war has exposed a perilous contradiction: the very American military infrastructure meant to protect the Gulf states has rendered them vulnerable to Iranian strikes. As the U.S. becomes a less reliable ally, these nations are cautiously seeking dialogue with Tehran, marking a seismic shift in regional politics. Their actions aren't a break from American influence but a pragmatic response to an urgent need for stability amidst rising tensions. The question remains—can they navigate this treacherous terrain without abandoning old alliances?
Europe stands at a crossroads, teetering between aspiration and disillusionment. While citizens envision a unified continent brimming with strength, their faith in existing structures crumbles under the weight of slow responses and dependency on America. With rising defense spending and manufacturing capacities, the stakes are high: will this newfound power serve the elite monopolies or empower the working class? The far-right feeds on feelings of decline, masking deeper questions about control and ownership. The real issue isn't a lack of imagination but the dire need for command: who controls Europe’s burgeoning power? The fight for true sovereignty—socially and politically—has only just begun.
Elbridge Colby's assertion that America is the "apex predator" in military readiness disguises the troubling reality of dwindling U.S. military supremacy against a rising China. The narrative expertly choreographs U.S. responses to China's actions, framing Washington as a stabilizing force while ignoring the material consequences of its expansive military infrastructure and the burdens it places on allies like the Philippines. This contrived status quo sustains American dominance at an ever-increasing cost, presenting imperial ambitions as mere defense. The real struggle lies not in choosing a stronger predator, but in dismantling the systems that perpetuate this militarized hierarchy, exposing the true stakes of U.S. imperialism.
