"Truth Is On The Side Of the Oppressed." – Malcolm X
Thomas Friedman tours China’s factories, admires what he sees, and calls for rebuilding Western power to compel Beijing’s obedience. Behind the machinery stands a revolutionary history of socialist construction that’s helped break the imperial centers’ grip on advanced production. Washington’s technological restrictions defend the power to decide who develops, on whose terms, and for whose... Continue Reading →
Marco Rubio's celebration of Western civilization conceals a history written through African and Asian scientific achievement, colonial conquest, capitalist exploitation, and revolutionary resistance. From ancient Greece to modern NATO, his manufactured civilizational inheritance transforms imperial domination into historical destiny while erasing the peoples whose labor built the world. Drawing on anti-colonial and Marxist scholarship, this investigation exposes how the political West was constructed through imperial rivalry, socialist revolutions, and struggles for national liberation. Beneath Rubio's mythology lies an American-led imperial bloc seeking renewed command over technology, finance, resources, and military power—and a continuing struggle to reclaim humanity's future.
UNGA 81 looked like a week of separate crises: Palestine, Iran, Venezuela, artificial intelligence and China. Beneath the speeches, however, each exposed the same unfinished contradiction between formal sovereignty and the unequal material power needed to make sovereignty real. Gaza’s reconstruction, Venezuela’s oil revenues, Iran’s negotiations under coercion, and the Global South’s struggle for technological capacity all reveal how finance, property, military force and infrastructure shape what legal equality can actually deliver. The summit’s real story wasn’t only what leaders said from the podium, but who still controls the machinery that gives those words weight.
NBC presents falling stocks, rising Treasury yields and volatile oil as separate market reactions to war. Put the pieces back together and a deeper political economy appears. The struggle over Hormuz is raising the cost of energy and global circulation while Washington is already refinancing enormous debts under sharply higher real yields. Those pressures don’t fall evenly: workers, indebted households and vulnerable importing countries absorb higher costs while energy producers and concentrated technology capital occupy very different positions. What looks like market turbulence is really a struggle over the rising material and financial cost of American command—and who gets forced to pay the bill.
Trump's United Nations address declares America’s resurgence, yet it reveals an empire grappling with an escalating need for military force and economic coercion to maintain supremacy. His speech elevates military spending, sanctions, and immigration enforcement as signs of strength while ignoring the underlying contradictions—an empire that once commanded effortlessly now relies heavily on intimidation. The reality is that the U.S. must work harder to enforce its will both abroad and domestically as competition grows and global power dynamics shift. Instead of showcasing dominance, Trump's rhetoric underscores a declining ability to produce consent, exposing the fragility of American imperialism. The mask of effortless domination is slipping.
Gil Durán's "The Nerd Reich" provocatively dissects the tech elite's evolution from libertarian ideals to an authoritarian grasp on power. Far from escaping state oversight, Silicon Valley's billionaires, like Peter Thiel, reveal a dark shift: they now seek to enhance governmental control while championing the illusion of individual freedom. Durán labels this new reality "tech fascism," where technology conglomerates and capital intertwine with state apparatus. As these technocrats consolidate power, a crucial question emerges: can humanity reclaim technologically wielded potential, or will it remain enslaved by elite ownership? This critical inquiry forebodes a future dominated by private interests rather than collective governance.
The U.S. state is vigorously fortifying its military and technological apparatus while systematically withdrawing social support through food assistance and healthcare, showcasing a disturbing trend of technofascist consolidation. As military might is acknowledged in orbit and social benefits dwindle, the ruling order exacerbates class divisions, demanding increased legitimacy from a population now subjected to strict classification and conditionality. Political expression faces barriers in increasingly privatized venues, reflecting a tactical alliance between state interests and tech monopolies. This ominous shift marks a historical reckoning: the state is reallocating its substantial resources toward military supremacy at the expense of everyday security, creating a precarious societal structure poised for conflict.
Peggy Noonan's alarm over socialism's surge reveals her flawed analysis: she blames the consciousness of the wounded instead of capitalism, which thrives on historical injustices like dispossession and slavery. As the capitalist structure crumbles under its contradictions—where collective production is shackled by private ownership—Noonan dismisses the urgency of socialism, painting it as a radical force aimed at destruction. Yet, socialism is rising not from whimsical ideology but out of necessity, as younger generations face economic precarity and disillusionment. The question isn’t whether capitalism is natural or just; it’s who truly controls the wealth and future built by the collective.
In the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, Marx discovers a contradiction that will haunt the whole development of his critique of capitalism: workers build an expanding world of wealth, machinery, knowledge and social power that returns to rule them as capital. This review follows that insight from wages and estranged labour through private property, colonial history, slavery, money, communism, Hegel and revolutionary humanism. It argues that the manuscripts are neither immature philosophy nor finished Marxism, but a breakthrough under pressure—one already forcing “Man” into history and asking the question that still matters: who controls humanity’s accumulated powers?
Bill Gates has finally acknowledged a truth that capitalists prefer to ignore: as AI and automation advance, corporations can reduce their reliance on human workers, yet those workers still need jobs to survive. This dystopian paradox manifests as corporations accumulate vast fixed capital while employing fewer people, leading to increasing labor insecurities. The state, ostensibly aiding automation's growth, is simultaneously crafting systems to manage this emerging class of excess workers. Gates proposes measures to protect jobs, but under capitalism, preserving employment becomes essential simply for survival, distorting the very essence of technological progress into a means of perpetuating exploitation rather than liberating humanity from labor.
