Max Blumenthal’s The Management of Savagery traces how the Afghan jihad, covert warfare, and the post-9/11 national-security state produced enemies Washington repeatedly claimed it could control. The full architecture of September 11 may never be known, but the official story cannot explain the accumulated record of intelligence failures, Saudi-linked facilitation, prior war planning, institutional obstruction, and immediate imperial exploitation. From Afghanistan and Iraq to Libya, Syria, domestic surveillance, and the rise of Trump, the same contradiction returns: empire weaponized instability, then lost control of the forces it empowered. Permanent war expanded American coercion while accelerating the collapse of the unipolar order.
The Worker Becomes Optional: The Wage Still Demands Your Life
Bill Gates has finally acknowledged a truth that capitalists prefer to ignore: as AI and automation advance, corporations can reduce their reliance on human workers, yet those workers still need jobs to survive. This dystopian paradox manifests as corporations accumulate vast fixed capital while employing fewer people, leading to increasing labor insecurities. The state, ostensibly aiding automation's growth, is simultaneously crafting systems to manage this emerging class of excess workers. Gates proposes measures to protect jobs, but under capitalism, preserving employment becomes essential simply for survival, distorting the very essence of technological progress into a means of perpetuating exploitation rather than liberating humanity from labor.
Sovereign Enough to Steal From: How American Law Turns Conquest Into Governance
Ward Churchill’s Perversions of Justice exposes the legal machinery through which Indigenous sovereignty is recognized just enough to legitimize treaties, land cessions, resource extraction and colonial administration—then restricted whenever it threatens settler possession or state power. Following that contradiction from conquest and property into uranium mining, blood quantum, AIM repression and U.S. imperial expansion, this review tests both Churchill’s strongest insights and his strategic limits. His final wager—that the colonizer’s own law can be weaponized to fracture legitimacy and withdraw consent—remains powerful. But the deeper revolutionary question is what turns that rupture into organized material counter-power.