Tag: icc

The Golden Age Needs a Gunboat: Trump’s UN Speech and the Rising Cost of American Command

Trump's United Nations address declares America’s resurgence, yet it reveals an empire grappling with an escalating need for military force and economic coercion to maintain supremacy. His speech elevates military spending, sanctions, and immigration enforcement as signs of strength while ignoring the underlying contradictions—an empire that once commanded effortlessly now relies heavily on intimidation. The reality is that the U.S. must work harder to enforce its will both abroad and domestically as competition grows and global power dynamics shift. Instead of showcasing dominance, Trump's rhetoric underscores a declining ability to produce consent, exposing the fragility of American imperialism. The mask of effortless domination is slipping.

0

The School Was Put on Trial, the War Wasn’t: How Minab Became the Crime Scene While Washington’s Attack Became Background

A UN investigation found reasonable grounds to believe U.S. forces committed war crimes in Iran after a primary school in Minab was struck and more than 150 people were killed. But the massacre cannot be understood as an isolated targeting failure inside an otherwise neutral war. The U.S.-Israeli assault began while diplomacy was still active, unfolded through a campaign that publicly celebrated overwhelming force, and repeatedly carried destructive power into civilian space. Minab exposes the larger structure: a war of aggression fragmented into legal incidents, technical explanations and media frames that make the crime scene visible while the war that created it slips into the background.

0

The Palestine Exception: Why Washington Is Trying to Break the ICC

The Guardian's coverage of Marco Rubio's claim that the International Criminal Court (ICC) threatens U.S. sovereignty highlights the deeper issue of imperial exemption rather than genuine sovereignty. The U.S. has long opposed ICC jurisdiction that could implicate American or allied personnel, reacting strongly against Palestinian efforts to document crimes under occupation. The article critiques the liberal institutionalism of the response, noting a lack of representation for affected parties. It underscores that U.S. sanctions targeting Palestinian organizations and ICC officials are a means to maintain impunity. Oppressed nations seek accountability, using available legal systems to challenge the dominance of imperial powers and protect their sovereignty against external coercion.

0

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑