This isn’t about uranium. It’s about independence. The U.S. and its vassals are weaponizing inspections to escalate hybrid warfare against Iran—a sovereign nation whose real crime is refusing to kneel before empire.
By Prince Kapone | Weaponized Information | May 31, 2025
The Scribes of Sanctions: Reuters, the IAEA, and the Manufacturing of Consent
The author of this Reuters piece, Parisa Hafezi, has spent the better part of her journalistic career recycling imperialist talking points under the illusion of objectivity. Based in Tehran but reporting for a British wire service, her role is not to challenge power, but to translate the jargon of empire into palatable prose for global consumption. Her bylines over the years have echoed State Department leaks, IAEA insinuations, and the periodic pretexts for siege—offering a thin veneer of local authenticity to narratives crafted in Washington, Tel Aviv, and Brussels.
Reuters itself—headquartered in the financial heart of the former British Empire—is no impartial observer. It is a commercial organ of imperialism, a propaganda refinery for the capitalist ruling class. Through its syndicated reach and global amplification, it shapes the storylines that become default reality for the world’s professional classes. It’s not that Reuters lies outright—its crime is more subtle, and more dangerous: strategic omission, ideological laundering, and the systematic reproduction of imperial assumptions as common sense.
Predictably, this narrative will be echoed and amplified by the usual suspects: CNN, BBC, France 24, Al Arabiya, Deutsche Welle. These institutions are not merely media outlets—they are information battalions in the global architecture of cognitive warfare. Think tanks like the Atlantic Council and policy shops like RAND will provide the “strategic depth,” while the IAEA plays the role of neutral enforcer—a fig leaf for lawfare, calibrated to pave the way for the next round of sanctions and escalations.
The article’s central tactic is temporal distortion. It recycles decades-old allegations—activities from the early 2000s—and packages them as fresh justification for punitive action in 2025. It draws attention to Iran’s 60% uranium enrichment levels without context, omits any mention of Iran’s rights under the NPT, and entirely erases the reality that the U.S. and its allies unilaterally violated the 2015 JCPOA. This is not journalism—it is narrative warfare. It is the kind of slow-drip disinformation that preceded the invasion of Iraq and the bombing of Libya. But unlike those cases, the empire has so far failed to break Iran.
And that is the point. This article isn’t about nuclear weapons. It’s about fabricating justification for a hybrid war already underway. The goal is not non-proliferation—it’s pacification. Not disarmament—but disobedience. Iran refuses to bow, and so the ideological groundwork must be laid: a “rogue state,” “undeclared materials,” “IAEA resolution,” and all the semantic camouflage that imperialism has perfected over the past century. This is the language of siege dressed up in diplomatic robes.
Before the bombs drop, before the sanctions deepen, and before the IMF vultures are sent circling, the narrative must be secured. That’s what this Reuters piece is: a brick in the wall of manufactured consent. But we see through it. And we tear it down.
What They Say, What They Bury, and What It Really Means
Reuters reports that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has accused Iran of carrying out undeclared nuclear activities at three sites—Lavisan-Shian, Varamin, and Turquzabad—some dating back to the early 2000s. The article states that Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile now includes 408.6 kilograms at 60% purity, and that Tehran has not adequately explained traces of uranium found at these locations. In response, the U.S., UK, France, and Germany are drafting a resolution against Iran at the IAEA Board of Governors. Iran, for its part, has dismissed the report as politically motivated and in violation of its sovereign rights.
These are the surface-level facts. But beneath them lies a mountain of buried context, deliberate omissions, and historical manipulation designed to manufacture the illusion of crisis. First and foremost, Iran is a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)—unlike Israel, the actual nuclear power in the region. The NPT explicitly grants Iran the sovereign right to enrich uranium and to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. There is nothing in the article—or in the IAEA report it references—that proves Iran has violated its legal obligations under the treaty. In fact, the agency’s own language reveals that its concerns are not based on current weapons development, but on unresolved “ambiguities” about past activities from over two decades ago.
What Reuters omits entirely is that Iran has been the target of systematic imperialist aggression for over 40 years: economic sanctions, cyberattacks (Stuxnet), targeted assassinations of scientists, and repeated threats of military invasion. The JCPOA nuclear deal, signed in 2015 and overseen by the IAEA itself, was torpedoed by the United States under the Trump administration in 2018—not by Iran. Since then, Iran has gradually increased its uranium enrichment in proportionate response to the U.S. withdrawal and ongoing European betrayal. None of this context is present in the Reuters article, because imperial propaganda depends not just on deception—but on strategic forgetting.
Equally omitted is the geostrategic calculus driving this renewed narrative push. Iran is not merely a state with a nuclear program—it is a regional power that exercises genuine independence from the Western imperialist bloc. It maintains state control over the commanding heights of its economy, has refused the privatization diktats of the IMF and World Bank, and continues to nationalize its vast oil reserves. Iran is strategically aligned with Russia and China and is deepening its cooperation within the emerging BRICS+ order. It provides material solidarity—not symbolic gestures—to anti-colonial movements across West Asia and North Africa, including Hezbollah in Lebanon, Ansar Allah in Yemen, and Hamas in Palestine.
In this context, the IAEA’s sudden rediscovery of two-decade-old “ambiguities” functions as a kind of institutional gaslighting. Its timing—amid regional upheaval, the collapse of Zionist legitimacy, and U.S. military realignment in the region—signals that the real target is not nuclear material, but sovereign resistance. The IAEA, for all its technocratic posturing, serves as the soft front of empire’s disciplinary machine: the polite auditor for hybrid war.
This is not about proliferation. It is about punishment. Not about security, but about supremacy. And as always, the facts are twisted into weapons—not to reveal the truth, but to conceal the crime.
Reframing the Narrative: Iran’s Crime Is Sovereignty, Not Uranium
The truth is not complicated, nor is it buried beneath layers of diplomatic nuance. The United States and its junior partners are not afraid that Iran is building a nuclear weapon. They know full well that Iran is not. There is no credible evidence—none—that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons. What there is, instead, is a carefully constructed fantasy, rehearsed and recycled by the Western imperialist media for over two decades: the myth of the Iranian bomb. This myth persists not because it’s true, but because it serves a purpose.
That purpose is to create a perpetual justification for economic war, diplomatic isolation, military threats, and regime change operations against a sovereign state that refuses to subordinate itself to the diktats of Western capital. The U.S. doesn’t care about nuclear non-proliferation. If it did, it would sanction Israel, which possesses hundreds of undeclared nuclear warheads. It would inspect its own stockpiles. It would rejoin the JCPOA it abandoned. But it won’t—because this was never about nuclear weapons.
What terrifies Washington is not enriched uranium—it’s uncompromising independence. Iran refuses to become another client state. It retains control over its energy sector. It refuses IMF structural adjustments. It nationalized its oil industry long before such moves were fashionable. It aligns militarily and diplomatically with anti-imperialist forces from Lebanon to Yemen. It has forged deep ties with China and Russia—two pillars of the multipolar order that threaten to eclipse U.S. unipolar dominance.
In every major regional faultline—from Syria to Palestine—Iran is a counterweight to U.S. hegemony. It funds and arms resistance movements. It denounces Zionism as a colonial project. It has survived decades of sanctions, assassination programs, and destabilization plots. It has done what no post-revolutionary state in the region was supposed to do: endure, adapt, and hold the line.
That is why the nuclear narrative must be kept alive. Not because of a bomb, but because of a banner: the banner of sovereignty. Iran has become a symbol—flawed and contradictory like any state, but symbol nonetheless—of what it means to chart a path outside the grip of empire. The accusations about secret sites and undeclared materials are not about actual violations—they are about disciplining defiance.
Let us be clear: even if Iran were to pursue nuclear weapons, we would understand it as a rational response to being encircled by hostile powers, threatened by nuclear-armed adversaries, and denied any protection by international law. But the fact is: Iran has not taken that step. It has operated within the boundaries of the NPT. And that has never mattered to the U.S.—because its real objective is not non-proliferation, but subjugation.
This is why every Reuters report, every IAEA leak, every Western press cycle must be reframed. Not as neutral information, but as active ideological warfare. The narrative isn’t just wrong. It’s lethal. It’s the prelude to sanctions. The justification for bombings. The intellectual scaffolding of a siege.
Iran is not a nuclear threat. Iran is a strategic problem for empire. And the only thing more dangerous than a sovereign state in the eyes of the West—is one that refuses to surrender.
Mobilizing Solidarity: From Narrative Resistance to Revolutionary Action
We must not merely reject the narrative—we must tear it from its roots and scatter it to the wind. What is happening to Iran is not an isolated episode of diplomatic tension. It is part of a long war: the war against sovereignty, against multipolarity, against any nation that dares to live outside the orbit of Western command. This is not about weapons. It is about walls—economic walls, narrative walls, military walls—erected to contain any independent path of development.
As anti-imperialist revolutionaries in the imperial core, our obligation is clear: we must stand in material, ideological, and organizational unity with the people of Iran and with the anti-colonial resistance they support across the region. This means refusing to reproduce the lies of the imperialist media apparatus. It means confronting the soft power of think tanks, UN bodies, and NGOs that act as velvet gloves for the iron fist. It means building counter-hegemonic infrastructure—in education, in media, in organizing—that exposes and disables the tools of hybrid warfare.
Iran is not alone in this struggle. From Cuba to Venezuela, from Nicaragua to Zimbabwe, from Russia to China to the Sahel, a new alignment is forming—a bloc of resistance that is refusing to comply with the sanctions architecture and military terror of the hyper-imperialist system. We must defend this bloc not because it is perfect, but because it is fighting the same enemy we are: the parasitic core of the capitalist world system, headquartered in Washington, Brussels, and London, and enforced by the dollar, drone, and data stream.
Wherever you are—whether in the belly of the beast or the edge of its shadow—concrete acts of solidarity matter:
- Organize teach-ins, political education forums, and counter-propaganda campaigns to demystify the IAEA and expose the role of media disinformation.
- Target the institutions enforcing the siege: protest the IMF, disrupt defense contractors, challenge university programs feeding into lawfare and nuclear surveillance infrastructure.
- Forge bonds with Iranian, Palestinian, and West Asian diaspora communities under threat, not in charity, but in revolutionary alliance.
- Strengthen anti-sanctions networks and join or build campaigns for divestment from imperialist war profiteers—Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Boeing, Northrop Grumman.
This is not a time for neutrality. Neutrality is complicity. Silence is betrayal. Whether it comes through drones, blockades, or headlines, the war on Iran is part of the war on all of us. To fight back, we must make the costs of empire unbearable. We must rupture the smooth flow of its lies. And we must become, in every word and deed, combatants in the global class war for sovereignty, dignity, and liberation.
Stand with Iran. Stand with the resistance. Stand with the world struggling to break the chain.
Weaponized Information 
Leave a comment