The Economist's recent critique of China's industrial prowess reveals a deeper hypocrisy within Western narratives. While it acknowledges China's efficiency, it vilifies state-driven competition when it disrupts Western hegemony. The real issue is not overproduction but an imbalance of purchasing power, presenting an ugly tableau of warehouses filled with goods while people lack access. As China strives for self-reliance, the West's response is to impose tariffs and sanctions, prioritizing monopoly over equitable distribution. This conflict isn’t a mere economic dispute; it’s a struggle for who controls productive capacity. The question is whether to align production with human need or maintain the status quo of inequality.
If You Can’t Join ’Em, Beat ’Em: China, the WTO, and the Empire’s Double Standard
China entered the U.S.-led global economy and rose through production, not plunder. But success without submission was never part of the deal. Now the empire cries foul—not because China broke the rules, but because it refused to stay colonized by them. By Prince Kapone | Weaponized Information | July 15, 2025When the Empire Writes Its... Continue Reading →